Back to the Future (1985): Chidren’s Fantasies of their Parents

The most popular film of 1985, Back to the Future grossed close to $100 million in domestic rentals, and eventually led to two sequels (both inferior).

As is the case of other blockbusters, technical (special effects) and artistic (high-quality acting) distinctions can only explain only in part its immense commercial success. Ultimately, though, it’s the film’s thematic issues, charm, and tone, which touching must have touched a chord in the collective consciousness. that catapulted the film to such a level of popularity.

The movie’s unusual appeal derived, at least in part, from its Freudian assumptions. For example, the failure of many kids to believe that their parents were once young like they are now. Or children’s wishful thinking that they are brighter, more knowing, and more in control over their fates than their parents were at their age. At the same time, children would also like to believe that their parents were smart and strong, or at least not dumb.

In actuality, kids can’t choose their parents, but they can wish or fantasize about having such control, and thus that their parents were once upon a time different. Back to the Future cashes in on one universal wish fulfillment: what happens when children possess the power to choose their parents and transform them into what they perceived to be ideal role models.

Back to the Future was not the only movie in the 1980s to deal with this fantasy: Coppola’s Peggy Sue Got Married (1986), which is concerned with similar issues, was dubbed in Hollywood “Back to the Future for Adults,” despite the fact that its screenplay had been written prior to Back to the Future.

Both films examine small-town life from two time perspectives, past and present. Both are comedies in the vein of Frank Capra (specifically, It’s a Wonderful Life), borrowing some of central ideas and motifs of that 1946 film. The two movies also share similar setting: California in the 1950s. Back to the Future is set in 1955, and Peggy Sue in 1960.  The age of their protagonists is also the same: in Back to the Future, Marty is 17; in Peggy Sue, the heroine goes from her early forties back to the age of 18.

Marty McFly (Michael J. Fox), the hero of Back to the Future, is a student at Elmdale High School. A media-minded kid, he owns all the recent technological innovations. We see on his desk all kinds of electronic tools and toys, including a cordless telephone. The walls of Marty’s room are covered with posters of rock stars and cars (Camaro Z-28).

Marty’s parents seem to be victims of suburban stagnation and easy, but uninspired, life. What must have been the American suburban dream of the 1950s has turned into a nightmare in the 1980s.  Marty’s house is in a development called “Lyon Estates,” a row of boring, monotonous houses, stretching toward the high-tension lines on the horizon. The suburban strip includes all the usual chains, like McDonald’s, Dunkin’ Donuts, Kentucky Fried Chicken, and others.

There is one exception to the norm, the house of the lunatic Dr. Emmett Brown (Christopher Lloyd), an old Victorian house in the midst of homogenous buildings. Doc is the last vestige of individualism when it comes to living quarters, lifestyle, and personality. Wearing a white sanitation suit, he is proud of his dog, a huge St. Bernard, named Einstein. Doc’s car, a sleek, stainless steel Delorean, has been remodeled, looking like a toy from Star Wars. At precisely 88 miles per hour, an atomic reaction is triggered, precipitating a miniature nuclear explosion.  Caught by terrorists at the shopping mall, Marty jumps into the car, and through Doc’ magic, is transplanted into another world.

Marty lands in an unknown country: the Peabody farm.  Its owners believe his car is a flying saucer from outer space, a reference to a popular phobia in the l950s. Marty finds himself on a two-lane highway, on which a lit billboard proudly states: “Step Into the Future with the All New 1955 Studebaker.”

It’s Saturday morning, November 5, 1955, to be exact. Tuning in to the radio, Marty listens to a commercial advertising “the best value in the 48 states,” and to Perry Como singing “Papa Loves Mambo.” President Eisenhower has just announced he would seek reelection of office. “Holy shit, 1955,” Marty exclaims, “I haven’t even been born yet!”

A series of surprises and revelations follow. Marty is shocked to realize that his father is a Peeping Tom. While watching with his binoculars from up on a tree a naked girl in the second story, the branch breaks and George tumbles into the street, just as a car is approaching. “Dad, look out,” cries Marty, knocking his father out of the path, and instead the car hits him. Rather characteristically of his father, instead of helping Marty, he leaves him there unconscious. Taken to the bedroom of his mother, Lorraine, Marty awakes up in bed wearing no pants. “They seemed a little tight, so I took them off,” she explains, calling him Calvin, because that’s the name (Calvin Kline) written on his underwear.

At the end, against great odds, Marty fulfills the ultimate fantasy of every child to control the fate of their parents and supervise his own birth. Moreover, Marty transforms his parents from losers to winners.  It’s in this motif that Back to the Future is most grounded in its immediate political and ideological context: Reagan’s obsessive stress on economic success, upward mobility, and good family life.

Indeed, in the last scene, George and Lorraine, dressed in their tennis outfits, carry themselves with confidence and self-importance. They project the image of a happily married couple. When Marty protests that he can’t go to the lake tonight because his father’s car is wrecked, his father corrects him, “There’s nothing wrong with my car, Biff is out there waxing it right now.”

In another extreme role reversal, the loutish Biff is now diligently waxing a new Lincoln Continental; his rough edges and arrogance have obviously subsided. A uniformed maid brings French toast, as George is talking about his new house and the new car for Marty. The movie also transforms the black hand at Lou’s cafe into a politician running for mayor.

In its up-beat philosophy, Back to the Future shows children’s wishful desire to redefine their–and their parents–reality. The movie reflects the (subconscious) desire of children to play an active part in bringing their parents together and in their own conception.

For an American film, the narrative of Back to the Future comes amazingly close to portraying incestuous relation between Marty and his mother, one that would have threatened his own birth.

Nonetheless, despite all its energy and optimism, the movie can’t conceal the fact that in 1985, the town lacks a physical identity or moral center and plays no role in the lives of its dwellers. It’s every man for himself, with no involvement in community life.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter