Oscar 2004: Critics Vs. Clint Eastwood

I don't think Clint Eastwood has bloomed. I think the press has been hornswoggled. “Unforgiven” was another Western in which you were pacifist until it's necessary for you to start shooting. I always see Eastwood following the script slavishly; I never see him taking off as a director. I would have loved to be around to blast his last couple of pictures that the press has been so excited about. It think people love the idea that a cowboy star actually can speak a sentence.

Pauline Kael, Premiere magazine

I wonder how Pauline Kael, the late New Yorker critic, would have reacted to the unanimous critical acclaim of Clint Eastwood's latest picture, “Million Dollar Baby.” Last month, “Million Dollar Baby” was named Best Picture by the National Society of Film Critics (NSFCS), of which Keal was a founding member back in 1966.

For about two decades, the NSCF was allegedly divided into two camps: the Paulettes and the Sarrisytes (the Andrew Sarris' group), with nearly insurmountable tension between the two during the annual voting meeting in January.

I became a member a decade ago, so I can't testify to that animosity. The divisions within the NSFC may still exist but they are looser, more amorphous that they were in the 1970s or 1980s. For one thing, Kael retired in 1991, and Sarris, while still a voting member, is less vocal about his auteurist approach. Furthermore, as became clear while working on my tribute volume, “Citizen Sarris, American Film Critic,” the battle over auteurism has long been won. Most critics today, whether consciously or not, are auteurists, and auteurism is now integrated not only into film scholarship but also into mainstream criticism and filmmaking.

Going beyond “Kael Vs. Clint,” an interesting question persists as to how significant and influential American film critics have been in this year's Oscar race, specifically vis-a-vis their assessments of the five nominated pictures: “The Aviator,” “Finding Neverland,” “Million Dollar Baby,” “Ray,” and “Sideways.” I have wanted to explore this issue ever since an earlier MCN column, “2004 in Review,” raised the question of “Who Needs Critics” Which I answered briefly: Eastwood, Scorsese, and Payne all need critics. Let me elaborate by pointing out some general trends of American film criticism of the past decade:
What's new about contemporary American movie criticism is that it's more democratic and pluralistic than ever before. No single critic today dominates the scene, or commands the respect and attention, that Sarris or Kael had at their prime, in the 1960s and 1970s, the golden age of American cinemaand film criticism.

That said, the overall quality of criticism has never been better due to the fact that most writers are graduates of film or journalism schools and thus bring sharper sensibility and deeper sense of film history to the their reviews.

Twenty five years ago, when I first met Vincent Canby, the late N.Y Times critic (at the New York Film Festival, he told me that, for his generation, the best and fastest way to become a movie critic was to be a “good reliable writer.” “If you wrote well about food or even politics,” to paraphrase Canby, “your editor might say, How would you like to try your hand at reviewing “Jaws” or even “Star Wars” for us” This career pattern has declined substantially, when film schools began to proliferate across the country, in the 1970s. But it has not disappeared completelythe L.A. Times has just promoted a TV reviewer with no cinema knowledge or experience as a film critic.

Consensus–Critics Possess More Power When Theyre United
An individual critic may single out in a widely read magazine “Chuck and Buck” or “Memento” as the year's best movie. However, if other strategic critics don't rally behind, as was the case of those titles, a single voice, even when it represents a mass-oriented publication such as E.W., has no clout or bearing; it's just a lone, eccentric voice in the wilderness.

This is the reason why critics' awards at year's end are crucial in determining the very chances of a particular movie to be Oscar-nominated. What critics groups and other associations, such as the National Board of Review, do in December is narrow down a broad field of 20 potential Oscar hopefuls to seven or eight pictures. (See MCN and Levy's Oscar Predictions charts over the past four months).

This year provides the best proof for the “United We Stand” trend. There is not doubt that Alexander Payne, the critics darling and two-time winner of LAFCA's Best Picture (“About Schmidt” in 2002 and this year's “Sideways”) benefited from the critical consensus of his wine-road comedy, which has swept more critics awards than any film in recent memory. If Payne's “About Schmidt” had received the unanimous accolades that “Sideways” did, it would have been nominated for Best Picture or Screenplay. However, since it didn't gather such momentum, “About Schmidt” was nominated for acting Oscars (Jack Nicholson and Kathy Bates).

In Payne's case, what the critics did, singly and more so collectively, was to ensure that Payne would be nominated for the DGA, and that “Sideways” would be taken seriously by the Academy. Not a minor feat, considering that very few independent films, usually the Miramax kind (“The English Patient,” “Chocolat,” “Cider House Rules”). The Academy may disregard the taste of one group, LAFCA's choice of “About Schmidt,” but it can't ignore completely a film that was chosen by at least ten groups, including BFCA, NYFC, LAFCA, HFPA, and others. Similarly, LAFCA's 2001 Picture Award for Todd Field's Sundance-premiered “In the Bedroom” promoted the visibility of this film and helped place it among the year's top contenders of the year.

With the Exception of Few Movies (Spider-Man 2) No Movie is Entirely Critics-Proof
There's no doubt that DreamWorks's “Shark Tale,” or Paramount's remake of The Manchurian Candidate would have scored better with Oscar voters and at the box-office, had they received more glowing notices. Spielberg's “The Terminal” and “A.I.,” and the Tom Cruise star vehicle “Minority Report” would have been more successful at the box-office, had they been embraced by all critics, as was Spielberg's “Saving Private Ryan.”
Dito for the other Tom, Hanks, who would have been nominated for “Road to Perdition,” had the Sam Mendes picture received similar acclaim to Mendes' impressive feature debut, “American Beauty,” which swept the 1999 Oscars.

It s not enough to deviate from your screen image and play hit men, as both Toms did recently (Cruise in “Collateral,” Hanks in “Road to Perdition” and “The Ladykillers”), you also do need the critics' seal of approval. Critics remain indifferent to Cruise's star turn and deviant image in “Collateral,” but they paid attention to Jamie Foxx in that film, helping him land a second, supporting nomination this year, along with a lead nod for “Ray.”

Critics possess invaluable power on Oscar voters when it comes to the acting categories in small independent films. Thus was evident in the case of two unknowns who came out of nowhere: Colombian-born Catalina Sandino Moreno (“Maria Full of Grace”), and Brit Imelda Staunton (“Vera Drake”). Moreover, though a known quantity, and two-time Oscar nominee, it's doubtful that Hollywood insider Annette Bening would have been nominated for “Being Julia,” if the critics didn't hail her performance. The movie, a schmaltzy old- fashioned meller from the 1930s (based on Somerset Maugham's novella, “Theatre”) was dismissed, but perceptive critics separated the actress from the source material of her star vehicle.

Critics Are Influential on Hollywood's Bastard Children
Critics are particularly influential on four types of Films: Independents, Art films, foreign-language, and documentaries. The very existence of these genres, all endangered species in today's increasingly competitive market, depends on critics' judgments in film festivals, where such fare often receives its world premiere. There is not doubt that the new American Independent Cinema has flourished over the past decade as a direct result of being championed by major critics.

Next to Cannes Festival, the Sundance festival is now the most influential film forum for the discovery of “hot” talent and “hot” movies. Since only the trades (“Variety, “Hollywood Reporter”) devote full-length reviews out of festivals, their critics exercise strong impact on determining the chances of a film to get theatrical distribution–or even play the global arthouse circuit. A number of art films, such as Godard's “In Praise of Love” and “Notre Musique,” were picked by American distributors after getting ecstatic notices in the trades.

Film Critics as Gatekeepers
One of the dangers of seeing mostly bad movies, which is the essence of what critics do routinely, is that when a truly interesting one comes along, it might be disregarded unless discerning critics write passionately about it. Indeed, without the active support of critics, “small” and original movies, such as “Boys Don't Cry,” “Being John Malkovich,” “You Can Count on Me,” “Rushmore,” “Election,” would have fallen through the cracks, and their filmmakers and performers would have never received any recognition. “Boys” Hilary Swank would have not received the Actress Oscar (in late March) had she not swept so many critics awards in December.

Critics as Reputation Makers and Career Builders
The career of a whole groups of filmmakers, arguably the most gifted working today, depends on the critical reception of their movies. Take Paul Thomas Anderson, whose features (“Boogie Nights,” “Magnolia,” “Punch-Drunk Love”) have all been commercial disappointments, each making less money than the previous one, but they still represent creative highlights of the new American cinema.

It's critics who brought Soderbergh back in from the cold, after making tiny movies (“The Underneath,” “Schizopolis,” “Gray's Anatomy”) that no one saw. The turning point in Soderbergh's career, which is now at its height, was the enthusiastic critical response to “Out of Sight,” which was cited as Best Picture by the NSFC in 1998.

One of the most brilliant directors working in American cinema today is Scorsese, whose last couple of pictures (“Kundun,” “Bringing Out the Dead,” “Gangs of New York”) had artistic merits but leave a lot to be desired commercially. Scorsese is still on the A-list of directors, and highly regarded by the entire industry, due to his talent, but also consistent stature among critics. Imagine if “The Aviator” were one of Scorsese's masterpieces, on the level of “The Godfather” or “Unforgiven,” both of which hailed by critics long before winning the Oscars and the public support.

This is by no means a new function. For decades, despite Pauline Kael's spiteful verdicts, auteurist critics have claimed that Clint Eastwood should be taken seriously as actor and director, that one day he will be making masterpieces, which indeed he has made, three over the past decade: the 1992 Unforgiven, the 2004 “Mystic River” and this year's “Million Dollar Baby,” which is going to sweep the Oscars comes February 27. It's doubtful that “Unforgiven would have won Best Picture Oscar, or gross $100 million, without the critics' strong backing. It's also doubtful that “Million Dollar Baby” would have scored so big, critically and commercially, without the critics' enthusiastic support.

xosotin chelseathông tin chuyển nhượngcâu lạc bộ bóng đá arsenalbóng đá atalantabundesligacầu thủ haalandUEFAevertonxosokeonhacaiketquabongdalichthidau7m.newskqbdtysokeobongdabongdalufutebol ao vivofutemaxmulticanaisonbethttps://bsport.fithttps://onbet88.ooohttps://i9bet.bizhttps://hi88.ooohttps://okvip.athttps://f8bet.athttps://fb88.cashhttps://vn88.cashhttps://shbet.atbóng đá world cupbóng đá inter milantin juventusbenzemala ligaclb leicester cityMUman citymessi lionelsalahnapolineymarpsgronaldoserie atottenhamvalenciaAS ROMALeverkusenac milanmbappenapolinewcastleaston villaliverpoolfa cupreal madridpremier leagueAjaxbao bong da247EPLbarcelonabournemouthaff cupasean footballbên lề sân cỏbáo bóng đá mớibóng đá cúp thế giớitin bóng đá ViệtUEFAbáo bóng đá việt namHuyền thoại bóng đágiải ngoại hạng anhSeagametap chi bong da the gioitin bong da lutrận đấu hôm nayviệt nam bóng đátin nong bong daBóng đá nữthể thao 7m24h bóng đábóng đá hôm naythe thao ngoai hang anhtin nhanh bóng đáphòng thay đồ bóng đábóng đá phủikèo nhà cái onbetbóng đá lu 2thông tin phòng thay đồthe thao vuaapp đánh lô đềdudoanxosoxổ số giải đặc biệthôm nay xổ sốkèo đẹp hôm nayketquaxosokq xskqxsmnsoi cầu ba miềnsoi cau thong kesxkt hôm naythế giới xổ sốxổ số 24hxo.soxoso3mienxo so ba mienxoso dac bietxosodientoanxổ số dự đoánvé số chiều xổxoso ket quaxosokienthietxoso kq hôm nayxoso ktxổ số megaxổ số mới nhất hôm nayxoso truc tiepxoso ViệtSX3MIENxs dự đoánxs mien bac hom nayxs miên namxsmientrungxsmn thu 7con số may mắn hôm nayKQXS 3 miền Bắc Trung Nam Nhanhdự đoán xổ số 3 miềndò vé sốdu doan xo so hom nayket qua xo xoket qua xo so.vntrúng thưởng xo sokq xoso trực tiếpket qua xskqxs 247số miền nams0x0 mienbacxosobamien hôm naysố đẹp hôm naysố đẹp trực tuyếnnuôi số đẹpxo so hom quaxoso ketquaxstruc tiep hom nayxổ số kiến thiết trực tiếpxổ số kq hôm nayso xo kq trực tuyenkết quả xổ số miền bắc trực tiếpxo so miền namxổ số miền nam trực tiếptrực tiếp xổ số hôm nayket wa xsKQ XOSOxoso onlinexo so truc tiep hom nayxsttso mien bac trong ngàyKQXS3Msố so mien bacdu doan xo so onlinedu doan cau loxổ số kenokqxs vnKQXOSOKQXS hôm naytrực tiếp kết quả xổ số ba miềncap lo dep nhat hom naysoi cầu chuẩn hôm nayso ket qua xo soXem kết quả xổ số nhanh nhấtSX3MIENXSMB chủ nhậtKQXSMNkết quả mở giải trực tuyếnGiờ vàng chốt số OnlineĐánh Đề Con Gìdò số miền namdò vé số hôm nayso mo so debach thủ lô đẹp nhất hôm naycầu đề hôm naykết quả xổ số kiến thiết toàn quốccau dep 88xsmb rong bach kimket qua xs 2023dự đoán xổ số hàng ngàyBạch thủ đề miền BắcSoi Cầu MB thần tàisoi cau vip 247soi cầu tốtsoi cầu miễn phísoi cau mb vipxsmb hom nayxs vietlottxsmn hôm naycầu lô đẹpthống kê lô kép xổ số miền Bắcquay thử xsmnxổ số thần tàiQuay thử XSMTxổ số chiều nayxo so mien nam hom nayweb đánh lô đề trực tuyến uy tínKQXS hôm nayxsmb ngày hôm nayXSMT chủ nhậtxổ số Power 6/55KQXS A trúng roycao thủ chốt sốbảng xổ số đặc biệtsoi cầu 247 vipsoi cầu wap 666Soi cầu miễn phí 888 VIPSoi Cau Chuan MBđộc thủ desố miền bắcthần tài cho sốKết quả xổ số thần tàiXem trực tiếp xổ sốXIN SỐ THẦN TÀI THỔ ĐỊACầu lô số đẹplô đẹp vip 24hsoi cầu miễn phí 888xổ số kiến thiết chiều nayXSMN thứ 7 hàng tuầnKết quả Xổ số Hồ Chí Minhnhà cái xổ số Việt NamXổ Số Đại PhátXổ số mới nhất Hôm Nayso xo mb hom nayxxmb88quay thu mbXo so Minh ChinhXS Minh Ngọc trực tiếp hôm nayXSMN 88XSTDxs than taixổ số UY TIN NHẤTxs vietlott 88SOI CẦU SIÊU CHUẨNSoiCauVietlô đẹp hôm nay vipket qua so xo hom naykqxsmb 30 ngàydự đoán xổ số 3 miềnSoi cầu 3 càng chuẩn xácbạch thủ lônuoi lo chuanbắt lô chuẩn theo ngàykq xo-solô 3 càngnuôi lô đề siêu vipcầu Lô Xiên XSMBđề về bao nhiêuSoi cầu x3xổ số kiến thiết ngày hôm nayquay thử xsmttruc tiep kết quả sxmntrực tiếp miền bắckết quả xổ số chấm vnbảng xs đặc biệt năm 2023soi cau xsmbxổ số hà nội hôm naysxmtxsmt hôm nayxs truc tiep mbketqua xo so onlinekqxs onlinexo số hôm nayXS3MTin xs hôm nayxsmn thu2XSMN hom nayxổ số miền bắc trực tiếp hôm naySO XOxsmbsxmn hôm nay188betlink188 xo sosoi cầu vip 88lô tô việtsoi lô việtXS247xs ba miềnchốt lô đẹp nhất hôm naychốt số xsmbCHƠI LÔ TÔsoi cau mn hom naychốt lô chuẩndu doan sxmtdự đoán xổ số onlinerồng bạch kim chốt 3 càng miễn phí hôm naythống kê lô gan miền bắcdàn đề lôCầu Kèo Đặc Biệtchốt cầu may mắnkết quả xổ số miền bắc hômSoi cầu vàng 777thẻ bài onlinedu doan mn 888soi cầu miền nam vipsoi cầu mt vipdàn de hôm nay7 cao thủ chốt sốsoi cau mien phi 7777 cao thủ chốt số nức tiếng3 càng miền bắcrồng bạch kim 777dàn de bất bạion newsddxsmn188betw88w88789bettf88sin88suvipsunwintf88five8812betsv88vn88Top 10 nhà cái uy tínsky88iwinlucky88nhacaisin88oxbetm88vn88w88789betiwinf8betrio66rio66lucky88oxbetvn88188bet789betMay-88five88one88sin88bk88xbetoxbetMU88188BETSV88RIO66ONBET88188betM88M88SV88Jun-68Jun-88one88iwinv9betw388OXBETw388w388onbetonbetonbetonbet88onbet88onbet88onbet88onbetonbetonbetonbetqh88mu88Nhà cái uy tínpog79vp777vp777vipbetvipbetuk88uk88typhu88typhu88tk88tk88sm66sm66me88me888live8live8livesm66me88win798livesm66me88win79pog79pog79vp777vp777uk88uk88tk88tk88luck8luck8kingbet86kingbet86k188k188hr99hr99123b8xbetvnvipbetsv66zbettaisunwin-vntyphu88vn138vwinvwinvi68ee881xbetrio66zbetvn138i9betvipfi88clubcf68onbet88ee88typhu88onbetonbetkhuyenmai12bet-moblie12betmoblietaimienphi247vi68clupcf68clupvipbeti9betqh88onb123onbefsoi cầunổ hũbắn cáđá gàđá gàgame bàicasinosoi cầuxóc đĩagame bàigiải mã giấc mơbầu cuaslot gamecasinonổ hủdàn đềBắn cácasinodàn đềnổ hũtài xỉuslot gamecasinobắn cáđá gàgame bàithể thaogame bàisoi cầukqsssoi cầucờ tướngbắn cágame bàixóc đĩa开云体育开云体育开云体育乐鱼体育乐鱼体育乐鱼体育亚新体育亚新体育亚新体育爱游戏爱游戏爱游戏华体会华体会华体会IM体育IM体育沙巴体育沙巴体育PM体育PM体育AG尊龙AG尊龙AG尊龙AG百家乐AG百家乐AG百家乐AG真人AG真人<AG真人<皇冠体育皇冠体育PG电子PG电子万博体育万博体育KOK体育KOK体育欧宝体育江南体育江南体育江南体育半岛体育半岛体育半岛体育凯发娱乐凯发娱乐杏彩体育杏彩体育杏彩体育FB体育PM真人PM真人<米乐娱乐米乐娱乐天博体育天博体育开元棋牌开元棋牌j9九游会j9九游会开云体育AG百家乐AG百家乐AG真人AG真人爱游戏华体会华体会im体育kok体育开云体育开云体育开云体育乐鱼体育乐鱼体育欧宝体育ob体育亚博体育亚博体育亚博体育亚博体育亚博体育亚博体育开云体育开云体育棋牌棋牌沙巴体育买球平台新葡京娱乐开云体育mu88qh88
Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter