Throughout the making of Holiday, pre-production work on the epic GWTW continued.
By February 1938, however, Selznick had depressing news to report. With a group of sequences still to come, the picture’s estimated length was 22,250 feet–far too long. They had to reduce its running time by almost half, which of course meant more work, more time, and more money.
My biography of George Cukor
With no clear idea of when shooting would begin, Selznick and Cukor discussed a new directing assignment to succeed Holiday, which was released n 1938.
On February 3, 1938, Selznick agreed to lend Cukor’s services to Paramount to direct a movie called Zaza. Under the loan-out terms, Cukor would receive separate card credits on the main credit title, and his name would be in type at least 60 percent as large as the type used for the title.
Zaza was based on an old French play about the loves and sorrows of a tumultuous French music hall siren. The play had an illustrious history: In 1889, the great French actress Rejane played the title role in Paris, and in l920, the legendary diva Geraldine Farrar sang the role at the Metropolitan Opera. Cukor perceived the Paramount remake as “terribly French,” what with “that endless exploration of unfaithfulness and the suffering of love.”
Claudette Colbert was cast as Zaza, a music hall performer, who falls in love with a handsome chance acquaintance, Dufresne (Herbert Marshall), only to become heartbroken upon learning that he is married and has a child.
What intrigued Cukor was not the illicit affair, but the relationship between the character’s public and private life, the tension between life onstage and off.
In his movie, he wished to convey the audience with a more realistic sense of a touring company’s daily life, where maintaining a sense of privacy was impossible; the whole troupe knows and talks about Zaza’s affairs of the heart.
At Paramount, Cukor met with less resistance to the demands of a period film than he had experienced at Metro. Hans Dreier, known for his atmospheric sets, came up with an interesting design for Zaza, creating an authentic outdoor cabaret , one that was complete with earth on floor. For Cukor, the period feeling of Zaza was as good as that Camille, starring Garbo.
The picture was photographed by Charles Lang, who was known for his ability to make women look ravishing. Zaza features stunning shots of Colbert in big, feathered hats that even she–a perfectionist–liked,
Colbert knew that was not originally cast in the picture. Shooting began with an Italian actress, Isa Miranda, but her accent was so heavy she could hardly be understood. Cukor wasn’t happy about the situation, and after a week demanded a new actress for the titular role, which was demanding.
Colbert, who was under contract to Paramount, remembered that the incident causing quite a stir on the lot; Cukor was after all not a Paramount contract director. “George came to my dressing room,” she told me in an interview, “telling me what a great play it was, how it had always been for the big star of the day, and blah, blah. He really knew how to talk you into things.”
Cukor and Colbert had never worked together, but they had met several years back, when both were working in the New York heater. According to Colbert, Cukor was a very personal director and, owing to his stage experience, particularly good with actors and sensitive to their needs.
“In my whole experience on screen, I never felt there was enough rehearsal to discuss things with the director. The camera was given much more time than the actors. But with George, you really felt that you had worked your part out. He went into deeper explanations than other directors about the character you played–motivation, feelings, changes, and so on.
Cukor was a whiz with dialogue,” said Edward Dmytryk, the editor of Zaza, “but he was never quite at home with the camera.” During shooting, Cukor would rehearse and stage a scene, then allow Dmytryk to work out the camera setups. Once the cameras were rolling, Cukor was again in charge.
Cukor knew what he wanted, and would continue shooting until he got it. “He took quite a few takes,” Colbert conceded, “but he never took unnecessary takes. He knew when it was good and when it was bad.”
Cukor, unlike William Wyler, held that there comes a time when the scene is done. “You have to let it go, for that’s going to be as good as it’s going to be. You accept it as such and don’t beat it to death.”
Occasionally, Cukor failed to get the results he wanted. Colbert recalled a scene where Zaza, dressed in her finery, gathers up the courage to go to Dufresne’s house, and his daughter answers the door. “The child was very beautiful,” Colbert said, “but not a good actress. George said to her, ‘Here is this beautiful lady, and I’ve got to see what you think.’ So I knocked on the door, and she opened it and just looked at me. And George said, ‘No, no, no, you’ve got to show me that you have never seen a lady dressed like this.’ We did it so many times, and the girl would open the door with this blank expression on her face.” After a dozen takes, realizing that he wasn’t getting what he wanted, Cukor sent his star home so that he could work with the child alone.
The next day, Colbert went to see the rushes at lunch time as was her practice. “I laughed so much,” she said, “Here is the little girl and you could only hear George’s voice as he said to the cameraman, ‘Don’t cut, we’ll just keep doing it a few times, while I talk to her.’ But the same thing happened again and again. He said, ‘here is this beautiful lady,’ and there was this very blank look.’ Finally he said, as she opened the door, ‘Look, I’m a Christmas tree, I’m a Christmas tree, and I’m covered with silver balls you have never seen before!’ The little girl gave him the same blank look.” Desperate, Cukor finally was forced to use a long shot of this scene.
It is a known fact that few children have appeared in Cukor’s films. “The idea of working with a child absolutely appalls me, as working with an animal appalls me.” Cukor understood that manipulation is the key to getting a good performance from children, and he hated that. Cukor was devastated by reports that Vincente Minnelli told Margaret O’Brien that her dog was dead, just in order to get her to cry in Meet Me in St. Louis.
My Biography of Minnelli
Colbert seemed more personal than the usual in Zaza. Cukor thought that as a comedienne Colbert had used only part of her talent and elegance; that her range was wider than she was given chance to display.
For example, Zaza was the only film in which Colbert had chance to display her pretty voice. Cukor brought his friend, comedienne Fanny Brice, on the set to coach her. Colbert recalled, “It was wonderful, no other director would do such a thing. That’s going a long way and indicative of the kind of director that George was.”
Fanny Brice taught Colbert how to contact an audience, how to command the stage. “You know, kid,” she told Colbert in her heavy Brooklyn accent, “when you sing a ballad, if you touch your own flesh, it’s a kind of comfort to ya.” Brice placed her beautiful hands at the base of her neck, and showed Colbert how to make each member of the audience feel she was looking directly at him with her penetrating eyes and radiant smile. “When they calm down,” Brice said, “especially if it’s a serious song, I fasten my eyes right below the balcony, and I sing.”
Said Colbert: “When I did out and out comedy with Lubitsch, it was heaven, because I understood comedy, Lubitsch understood comedy, and he was very funny himself.” But Zaza’s essential story was not really a comedy. And there was a big difference between Cukor and Lubitsch, though Colbert was “crazy” about both of them. “Lubitsch was a complete personality in his own way,” she said, “he always had a piano on the set and he would play and make jokes between sets. George was not that type. His humor was with you, personally, just talking; he did not spend the day entertaining his cast.”
If Colbert was perfectly cast, Cukor didn’t think that Herbert Marshall. experienced as he was, was right to play the married lover; he was too stuffy, too much of an English gentleman, which meant that his adulterous duplicity was not believable.
Cukor had a wonderful habit of using older actresses in need for a job in his movies. One of these, Mrs. Zimmerman, an elderly stage actress, was always on the set of Zaza. She was quite a character, according to Colbert, wonderful woman but also very foul. Bert Lahr, who played Cascart, Zaza’s faithful manager, was very annoyed by her. “Bert was a great comedian,” Colbert said, “but he was playing a straight part, and Zimmerman didn’t like what he was doing. She would sit under that camera like a little Buddha, and everything would show on her face.” When they were rehearsing, Cukor was did not see her, but Lahr couldn’t avoid looking at her.
Finally, Lahr said to Colbert, “She’s driving me crazy, I’m going mad.” “Oh, just ignore her,” said Colbert, “don’t look at her, she’s Russian, she’s got her own ways.'” Lahr then said, “I’d like to ask her if she can do a time step.” To which Colbert replied, “Bert, don’t ask her, from what I’ve seen she might be able to.” At this point, Cukor, who had overheard the whole conversation, burst out laughing.
Cascart, Lahr’s first dramatic effort, became his breakthrough. “Cukor edited me,” Lahr later said, “He would take me aside and say, `Act simple, Bert, simple. Cut it down to half. You’ve got a microphone above you. You don’t have to kick it out and project to an audience of a thousand people. Let the camera do the work.” Cukor was the first director to help Lahr adapt to the film medium.
As always, Cukor’s direction was very precise. When Cascart is encouraging the depressed Zaza, Lahr has a line, “Oh, come now, you’ll cry your eyes out over a dozen worse fellows yet.” During rehearsals, Lahr had difficulty making the scene work. “When you see she is unimpressed,” Cukor suggested, “you try some other way to cheer her up. Use that funny laugh from your act.” Lahr ran through his repertoire of laughs until Cukor singled out the one he liked. But later, when they filmed the scene, his laugh was somehow different. Cukor stopped the cameras, and insisted on reshooting again and again, until Lahr gave him the “right” laugh.
When shooting ended, Zaza got an absolute turndown by the Hays office and many cuts were demanded. “It was so stupid,” Colbert said, “because Zaza had been a big success at the turn of the century, and all of a sudden the Hays Office thought it was risqué.” But morals in 1939 were so rigid and the authority of the Hays office so absolute, that most of the film’s pristine shock had to be expunged. “These long despairing scenes were all cut,” Cukor later lamented. Despite problems with the Hays office, Paramount’s top brass thought the film was one of studio’s best in years.
With some confidence, the company traveled to a double preview, in Oakland and San Francisco. At the first night in Oakland, the preview began well and the film played beautifully for almost an hour, but then “all hell broke loose.”
In the story, Zaza goes to Paris, confirms her lover’s marriage without his knowledge, returns home and awaits his arrival. She hopes everything will be the same, but as he entered, preceded by a huge bouquet of white roses, the audience began to hiss. “Not Friday-night students-at-the-flicks hissing, but the real hissing,” Dmytryk recalled. Though one of the film’s best scenes unrolled on screen, no one heard it, as the audience’s angry reaction continued right through the bitter end.
Shocked by this turn of events, a few emergency cuts were made the next morning. They now hoped that a more cosmopolitan San Francisco audience would find the film acceptable. The viewers were indeed somewhat younger and more sophisticated, but the reaction was the same. Audiences simply could not forgive the hero for deceiving Zaza, making a “loose woman” out of her. Interestingly, there was evidence that watching the film alone, a person would accept its morality, but that same person when surrounded by others, joined in a “mob” reaction. Zaza demonstrated that “censorship never led, it merely reflected the common attitudes of the public.”
The return to Hollywood was a “nightmare of despair.” The ending was reshot, and further cuts were made. But each time the film was tested with an audience, whether in or outside big cities, the reaction was similar. There was little more Paramount could do. Colbert was shooting Midnight, when her brother came on the set with news that he had just seen Zaza’s final version. “They’ve cut and ruined it,” he reported. “I was very upset,” said the actress, “I couldn’t see the film for a very long time.” Cukor, too, was furious–the film he made would never be seen.
Zaza was quietly released on January 5, 1939, and just as quietly died at the box-office. Negative reaction from the press, led by queen gossiper Louella Parsons, did not help either. Nor did almost universal condemnation from local and state religious organizations.
The film turned out to be one of the few big box-office failures in Cukor’s long and productive career, which is why it is seldom shown in Cukor retrospectives.
In general, the winter of 1939 was a particularly bad one for Cukor: One month after Zaza’s disastrous opening, he would be fired from Gone With the Wind, a movie that he had entirely cast and worked on for nearly two years.
