Moneyball (2011): Jonah Hill’s Best (Oscar?) Role Ever

Billy Beane’s revamping of the Oakland A’s was a collaborative effort, one that relied on his recruitment of a team of economic analysts who replaced baseball’s hunches and gut instincts with a fresh skew towards science.

To capture the essence of the math brains who changed American sports, the screenwriters created the character of Peter Brand.

As played by Jonah Hill, Brand is an Ivy League economist turned unlikely baseball analyst – a guy who in any other field might be among the best and brightest, but in baseball has been relegated to outsider status.  It is Brand who keys Beane into one of the main insights behind the “moneyball” concept:  that the value of a baseball player isn’t something you can see or sense, but something you find lurking in the numbers.  When Beane hires Brand away from the Cleveland Indians with the intention to put his stats-based approach front and center for the A’s – no matter the fallout — he sets the two men on a collision course with baseball orthodoxy.

“Peter Brand is an outsider,” says Miller.  “He’s an Ivy League kid with a degree in economics and a perspective on the game that nobody in baseball could possibly have had. Billy plucks Pete from a cubicle in Cleveland and weaponizes him.”

Best known for his comedic performances, Hill welcomed the chance to sink his teeth into a subtle, dramatic performance. He approached the character as a baseball interloper driven by a true love of the game, and a man who grows on the job.

“Peter Brand is the kind of guy who really should be a billionaire on Wall Street, except that he loves baseball,” observes Hill.  “Because of his background, he judges players in a different way than the system supports.  He’s all about the facts. He realizes it’s not about how a guy throws, how fast he runs or what he looks like.  It’s about how often he gets on base.”

Yet what seems perfectly logical to Brand, comes across at first to the rest of the baseball world as a threat to a grand tradition.  “It’s a natural reaction,” notes Hill.  “Any time you try to change the way things are done, people from the previous generations are going to be upset, especially if you’re saying what they’re doing is unproductive.  You can understand why they think ‘who is this kid using a computer to tell me who the players should be?’”

While Beane and Brand couldn’t be more divergent personalities, Hill says one attitude unites them. “For both men, it’s them versus the world,” Hill explains.  “These are two guys with their backs against the wall who find the guts to fight for what they believe in.”

The evolving interplay of Beane and Brand’s partnership became a deeper entrée into the story’s themes of the intricate algorithms of human value and success.  Observes Rachael Horovitz: “Billy and Peter complement each other, but there’s a subtle, healthy jealousy too. The simple fact that Peter is educated, has his whole life in front of him, hasn’t made any mistakes yet – these givens are a constant presence in their relationship – they are facts Billy is aware of and even speaks to when the going gets tough. In turn, Peter is never going to get to play for the Mets or anybody else. And you just know that disappoints him on some level.”